<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>John Bell and Associates Newsletter</title>
        <link>http://www.proaxis.com/~johnbell</link>
        <description>John Bell and Associates Newsletter Latest Articles</description>
        <!--
        <item>
            <title>The 2012 Variable Probability Sampling Workshop March 26-30, 2012</title>
            <link>http://oregonstate.edu/conferences/event/variableprobability2012/</link>
            <description>The workshop will be held on the campus of Oregon State University.</description>
        </item>
        -->
        <item>
            <title>Imaginary Heights in Variable Plot Cruising (02/12/2012)</title>
            <link>http://www.proaxis.com/~johnbell/regular/regular_online9.htm</link>
            <description>When fixed plots were used, they measured (or estimated) all the tree heights.  
            Not a smart idea, just a habit formed over years.  As we moved to Variable Plot sampling, 
            the computer programmers tried to shove the VP sampling system into the old computer routines.  
            Having a height was expected, even though VP volume calculations did not require heights on 
            all the trees.  People did not think this through very well.</description>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Quality Control in Computers and Publications (01/08/2012)</title>
            <link>http://www.proaxis.com/~johnbell/regular/regular_online8.htm</link>
            <description>Computer programs were always a problem, and the code never seemed to be checked
             by the people who actually understood the details.  In some cases, they were not allowed to 
             – only the geeks had access.</description>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>The Camp Riley Cruise Experiment (04/29/2011)</title>
            <link>http://www.proaxis.com/~johnbell/regular/regular_online7.htm</link>
            <description>George Deegan sent along this report of some work that he did with the DNR.  
            He gave us permission to edit it slightly for the newsletter, but is essentially as he sent
             it to us.  It is a wonderful example of the trade-off you get when you try for more data 
             (tree VBARs) by estimating heights vs. carefully measuring a smaller number of tree VBARs 
             that balance the Basal Area estimate.  I remember seeing this same affect in cruises done 
             in Michigan.</description>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title>The Point of Reading Old Papers -- CAREFULLY (10/13/2010)</title>
            <link>http://www.proaxis.com/~johnbell/regular/regular_online6.htm</link>
            <description> I suppose all of us, particularly husbands, have a handful of 
            “this is how stupid I once was” stories.  Here is one from my professional life....
			</description>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Compassman, The Nun, and the Steakhouse Statistician</title>
            <link>http://www.proaxis.com/~johnbell/compassman/compassman.htm</link>
            <description>Read the latest installment from Kim Iles second book.</description>
        </item>

    </channel>
</rss>
